Comments on: Reputation 2.0? http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2008/10/22/reputation-20/ building a healthy information ecosystem Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:41:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Reputationist http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2008/10/22/reputation-20/comment-page-1/#comment-228 Reputationist Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:29:50 +0000 http://www.shoutingloudly.com/?p=572#comment-228 As I read you post I was taken by the conceptual frame you used for your argument - that tracking consistent expressions of behavior performance was valuable. I agree. The issue I have focused on is the human interactions based in reputation that produce expressions of promotional trust. People you trust you tend to remark to others regarding that trust. Even when there are expressions that might taint the trust understood would speak in the defense of the trusted. From an application stand point I support your call for a system that can sort out the different inputs - but context of organizational expressions I think my argument for strategic conversation - http://reputationist.com/2008/01/strategic-conversations.html describes by case for leaderships role in the production of reputation. As I read you post I was taken by the conceptual frame you used for your argument – that tracking consistent expressions of behavior performance was valuable. I agree. The issue I have focused on is the human interactions based in reputation that produce expressions of promotional trust. People you trust you tend to remark to others regarding that trust. Even when there are expressions that might taint the trust understood would speak in the defense of the trusted.

From an application stand point I support your call for a system that can sort out the different inputs – but context of organizational expressions I think my argument for strategic conversation – http://reputationist.com/2008/01/strategic-conversations.html describes by case for leaderships role in the production of reputation.

]]>