<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Guerilla Gamemaker Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2007/01/20/thoughts-on-the-guerilla-gamemaker-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2007/01/20/thoughts-on-the-guerilla-gamemaker-competition/</link>
	<description>building a healthy information ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 02:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2007/01/20/thoughts-on-the-guerilla-gamemaker-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2007/01/20/thoughts-on-the-guerilla-gamemaker-competition/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.joystiq.com/~r/weblogsinc/joystiq/~3/79905395/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joystiq points out&lt;/a&gt; that Slamdance has actually dealt with legal issues in the past:&lt;blockquote&gt;But wait. The site also mentions that &quot;the organization annually takes on legal matters in support of the independent artists.&quot; Indeed, in 2001, Slamdance stood up to legal threats from Artisan Entertainment and hosted a surprise showing of controversial documentary &quot;Brooklyn Babylon.&quot; We find it hard that Slamdance had the resources to stand up to a distinct, stated legal threat from a major independent movie studio like Artisan but doesn&#039;t have the resources to handle vague, potential legal threat over Super Columbine Massacre RPG....

It seems to us that Baxter is just trying to come up with a convenient excuse for a hypocritical decision to duck away from defending a controversial game in the same way he would defend a controversial movie. But, as we all know, games are just kid&#039;s stuff, so really, who can blame him?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feeds.joystiq.com/~r/weblogsinc/joystiq/~3/79905395/" rel="nofollow">Joystiq points out</a> that Slamdance has actually dealt with legal issues in the past:<br />
<blockquote>But wait. The site also mentions that &#8220;the organization annually takes on legal matters in support of the independent artists.&#8221; Indeed, in 2001, Slamdance stood up to legal threats from Artisan Entertainment and hosted a surprise showing of controversial documentary &#8220;Brooklyn Babylon.&#8221; We find it hard that Slamdance had the resources to stand up to a distinct, stated legal threat from a major independent movie studio like Artisan but doesn&#8217;t have the resources to handle vague, potential legal threat over Super Columbine Massacre RPG&#8230;.</p>
<p>It seems to us that Baxter is just trying to come up with a convenient excuse for a hypocritical decision to duck away from defending a controversial game in the same way he would defend a controversial movie. But, as we all know, games are just kid&#8217;s stuff, so really, who can blame him?
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
