<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MS pushes beta anti-piracy program on ALL users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2006/06/15/ms-pushes-beta-anti-piracy-program-on-all-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2006/06/15/ms-pushes-beta-anti-piracy-program-on-all-users/</link>
	<description>building a healthy information ecosystem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shouting loudly &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MS draws legal, PR heat over anti-piracy tool</title>
		<link>http://www.shoutingloudly.com/2006/06/15/ms-pushes-beta-anti-piracy-program-on-all-users/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>shouting loudly &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MS draws legal, PR heat over anti-piracy tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoutingloudly.com/2006/06/15/ms-pushes-beta-anti-piracy-program-on-all-users/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] As I&#8217;ve detailed elsewhere, Microsoft placed WGA in its list of critical updates, meaning most users have installed it automatically just like any other security patch. MS did this when the program was still in beta mode; they were still testing it and knew it needed refinement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I&#8217;ve detailed elsewhere, Microsoft placed WGA in its list of critical updates, meaning most users have installed it automatically just like any other security patch. MS did this when the program was still in beta mode; they were still testing it and knew it needed refinement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

